My
father, William E. Ashbrook, had a heart for the fundamental church. He came out
of modernism. That step cost him his pulpit and his pension. He loved the men
and movements which shared that step of obedience. On the other side, he hated
apostasy with its opposite set of men and movements. Apostasy had cut the heart
out of Christianity and had stolen the hope of its hearers. He was never too
busy to donate an evening of his time to any little group of people in our state
who were seeking a way out of an apostate denomination.
In 1958 my father completed an
eight page tract titled, Evangelicalism:
The New Neutralism. He put a stack of them on the literature table at the
back of his church and began to give them to his friends and enemies. He had
witnessed the founding of the National Association of Evangelicals in 1942 with
an official position of neutrality in the great conflict with apostasy. About
1943 he had his own personal skirmishes with the authorities of Wheaton College
over its quiet change from fundamentalism to neutralism. He analyzed the
speeches of the founding fathers of Fuller Seminary in 1947 and 1948 and saw
again the danger of neutrality in the great battle between faith and unbelief.
As the new evangelical movement
began to develop, my father became more agitated about the things he saw. He
correctly discerned that the move to neutrality would be a gradual curve to the
left instead of a straight line. Each time he needed a new printing of The New Neutralism, he would add a few more pages of recent
developments. He published a new edition in 1966, another in 1969 and one in
1970. In 1971 he suffered a stroke which took him out of his pulpit ministry
However, a year or two later he said to me, "Son, I believe the Lord wants
me to get out one more edition of The New
Neutralism before he takes me home, but I have lost some of my ability to
organize, and I will need your help." That began a two-day work trip
to Columbus each month. My wife and I would leave our home in Mentor, Ohio early
on a Monday morning and come back late Tuesday evening. I would help write, and
she would type our efforts. Thus, the last edition was finished in 1975. My
father's reaction to his first look at the completed book was to share the
feeling of Simeon and add some of his own words by saying, "Lord, now
lettest thou thy servant depart in peace, for I have finished the task thou
dids't give me." The eight pages of 1958 had become the 128 pages of 1975.
The Lord did not immediately respond to Dad's feeling. My father had the joy of
mailing several thousand copies of The New
Neutralism before the Lord took him home from his armchair, April 5, 1977.
As I write these words in 1991, I
am aware that sixteen years of new evangelical history have gone by since the
last addition to Dad's book. I have continued to have The New Neutralism reprinted. I have wrapped and mailed my own
several thousand copies. I have been amply repaid by unsolicited letters from
pastors, missionaries, and laymen telling how God used the book to clear their
vision and reclaim them from new evangelicalism. As I have read those letters
the conviction has grown in my heart that the book needs to be updated. I have
put if off and argued that someone else should undertake the work. That
someone else has not turned up. I have accepted the conviction in my heart and
the absence of that other person as the Lord's summons to the task.
New evangelicalism has become famous for
its use of the term, "Explo," as a contraction of explosion. My father
used to refer to Bill Bright as the godfather of explos and extravaganzas. The
term explosion also fits in another way. The movement which Dr. Harold Ockenga
christened neo-evangelicalism in 1948 has become an explosion in 1991.
It has been like a cluster bomb streaking in every direction. Over the years the
explosion of new evangelicalism has done no damage at all to the fortress of
liberalism. However, it has left devastation on the field of fundamentalism. The
healthy fundamentalism which I knew as a student in 1948 has been almost
destroyed by the infiltration of new evangelicalism. It is amazing how innocuous
the disease has been to liberals and how virulent it has been to
fundamentalists. Wherever the explosion has reverberated, it has destroyed sound
doctrine, reverent worship, and holy living among the Lord's people.
![]()
![]()